California Green Builder / Building Industry Institute


Just a quick editor’s note (and honestly, a little self-promotion) to let you know I will be a panelist on September 25, 2010 at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the State Bar of California.  You don’t have to be an attorney to attend, so please consider this engaging educational event.  The Annual Meeting will be held in Monterey, California from September 23 -26.  My panel is entitled Sustainable Development: Moving Beyond Green Building Toward Sustainable Building and Master Planning, and I will be joined by Ed Quevedo and Bret Stone of the Paladin Law Group, (a great law firm by the way). 

The Annual Meeting promises to be informative, and our panel will address a number of the new developments in laws supporting sustainablity.  The keynote speaker this year is Justice Anthony Kennedy, and there are lots of other insightful speakers.  Check 0ut the dozens of sessions by clicking the link above!

While we’re discussing conferences, I want to note that West Coast Green 2010 is coming up September 30 – October 2, 2010.  Once again, West Coast Green lo0ks to be a fantastic event at the same scenic location on the bay in San Francisco.  Last year it was a lot of fun. Note that the early bird discount for West Coast Green ends today, August 20!

Also note, the USGBC’s GreenBuild, November 17-19 in Chicago, IL, has early registration going on, too (until September 10).  They have not announced the keynote speaker for GreenBuild, and it will be tough to top Al Gore from last year… who knows….  Regardless of the speakers, I attended last year, and it was a blast (though Gore was a very inspiring speaker).  It is still the largest green building conference and expo in the United States (if not the world).

Hi All,

A friendly reminder that I am presenting in one of three great webinars presented by the State Bar of California.  The webinars will be on May 12, 19, and 26.  If you can’t make these dates, you can register by the date of the event, and listen any time in the three months afterward.

The first webinar is “Sustainable Development: Moving Beyond Green Building Toward Sustainable Building and Sustainable Master Planning” I will discuss alternatives to LEED and the many factors interested parties should consider when designing and developing sustainable buildings and neighborhoods.  Jeff Conner (Conner & Associates), Matt Burris (CTG), and Patricia Chen (Miles Chen Law Group, P.C.) will join me  in a roundtable discussion that will discuss LEED as well as other ways to develop a sustainable project (i.e. ICC, GreenPoint Rated, or independent assessment).  Each approach requires unique planning and permitting.  More information can be found by clicking here.

Our webinar is the first of a series.  There are two more webinars that are really worth checking out.  The first is , “Sustainable Development: Charting a Course to a Sustainable Future Through CEQA Compliance and Effective Climate Action Planning – Demystifying AB 32 and SB 375″ and the second is “Sustainable Development: The California General Plan Law and General Plan Updates: The Future of Sustainable Development”

We hope to catch you online at these events!

Editor’s Note:  The CGBB is always pleased to have Sarah Grilli contribute, and here is her latest post:

On Tuesday January 12, 2010 California became the first state in the USA to pass a state-wide building code that requires comprehensive sustainable construction and energy reduction. Currently voluntary, the CalGreen Codes are mandatory starting January 2011.

The codes focus on all aspects of sustainable buildings (materials, energy, water, construction and other waste). An important piece of the legislation that media failed to mention, however, is the requirement for building commissioning and post occupancy systems management. This often overlooked piece is seen as a huge victory by the USGBC whose LEED version 3.0 also placed significant emphasis on systems performance elements.

Several California environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club and NRDC along with, Build-it-Green and the USGBC (the two leading CA organizations with private green rating systems) have opposed certain elements of the codes.  A key concern for some of these groups is the fear the new code will allow developers to market a development as “green” by building to code instead of the more stringent private rating systems.  Thus, the new codes may cause marketplace confusion about the definition of a “green” building.

These concerns are legitimate.  The fight to define “green,” is the subject of constant debate.  Take the term “organic” for example.  The federal “organic” label is regularly the subject of litigation and debate.  Is “green” different?

As sustainable building measures become commonplace, the building community and the public will strive to comprehend what elements make a building “green.”  People may still opt for buildings that exceed the State’s green code, but the state now provides an easier option.  As long as the codes are enforced, smaller California communities without any green elements in their building codes will benefit enormously. This is precisely the reason a national energy efficiency building code is needed.

It is possible that “green building” will follow a similar path as “organic,” and the federal government will pass a national energy efficiency building code (See our post on the subject here and a fact sheet from the EPA here). There will always be variations on quality, but at the end of the day what’s most important is that “green building” practices become the norm.

Recent news have been mainly a dismal affair when it comes to the economy.  One report states that all but five metropolitan cities will suffer major job losses.  Another report states that graduates from top universities are unable to find jobs, despite stellar grades and credentials.

In the midst of all of this, I found one piece of positive news pertaining to jobs in the clean energy sector:

According to Fast Company, a magazine devoted to innovation and technology, the following ten jobs will be in high demand over the next decade as the country continues to increase investment in clean energy:

  1. Farmer - America’s two million farmers, with an average age of 55, will need to be replaced by a larger group of smaller-scale farmers
  2. Forester – deforestation, which has become a leading source of carbon credits worth billions of dollars, will increase the need for foresters skilled in finance, conservation, and development.
  3. Solar Power Installer – greater need for installers if anticipated tax credits are accelerated
  4. Energy Efficiency Builder (LEED) - increased need for specialized architect, engineers, and retrofit workers
  5. Wind Turbine Fabricator – fastest-growing source of alternative energy will create a need for new jobs in this sector
  6. Conservation Biologist – need to preserve the integrity of world’s ecosystems
  7. Green MBA/Entrepreneur – need to assess the “triple bottom line” – People, Planet, Profit
  8. Recycler - create alternatives to high costs associated with disposal
  9. Sustainability Systems Developer – create new software to run clean energy networks
  10. Urban Planner – increasing the use of mass transit, limiting suburban sprawl

Of course, some of the growth in the aforementioned job fields may be contingent upon the passing of President Obama’s $1 trillion economic stiumulus plan, which will provide federal funding for renewable energy, mass transit, construction, and renovation, among other things.

The following is an excerpt of an article I wrote for the Bell, Rosenberg & Hughes newsletter.  It’s a little dated for a blog post. But the article provides some good introductory information, so I wanted to include it here.  Let me know what you think.

 

Green certification programs offer builders and developers an opportunity to set themselves apart from competition.  With the declining cost of implementing green features into construction, builders and developers don’t need to spend green to “go green.”[1]  Some green features do add costs to the price of a home, but the opportunity to offer a home that will not have an energy bill may be a benefit for which homebuyers are willing to pay a premium.[2]  The California Green Builder program (www.cagreenbuilder.org) – created by The Building Industry Institute, the research arm of the California Building Industry Association – has been guiding builders for over two years, but two new certifications for residential homes made their debut in 2007.  Build It Green (www.builditgreen.org), a professional non-profit membership organization whose mission is to promote healthy, energy- and resource-efficient buildings in California, launched the GreenPoint Rated system; and the U.S. Green Building Council (“USGBC”) formally announced the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED”) for Homes rating system during the first week in November of 2007 (www.usgbc.org).  The LEED program has been helping commercial developers and builders for years, but the LEED for Homes program is the first LEED for single-family residences.  These three programs offer developers, builders and buyers a scale of options for measuring environmental friendliness. The good news is picking one certification program does not preclude you from fulfilling the requirements of another.

 

The LEED for Homes system offers a wide range of options for builders and developers.  Projects can be “Certified,” “Silver,” “Gold,” or “Platinum,” based on the level of environmental friendliness.  One clear advantage is the program is building a nationwide reputation, so buyers moving to California from other states will recognize the LEED brandname.  The USGBC officially launched LEED for Homes at the Greenbuild Conference in Chicago in November 2007, although the pilot program was launched in 2005 and modified in February 2007.

 

Admittedly, LEED for Homes is not for every builder or buyer, and the USGBC forecasts that the program will only be a deciding factor for 25% of home buyers nationwide.  Attaining a LEED rating at any level adds some cost for the independent verification process.  However, Californians have a high standard for home building, and a unique affinity for environmental sensitivity.  Add to that the higher cost of energy in California, and one can imagine the demand for LEED rated residential homes will likely outpace national averages.  In fact, of the 134 certified LEED for Homes projects built nationally under the pilot program, 55 were in California, and of the 336 units, 78 were in California.  That’s 41% of the projects and 23% of the units nationwide![3]

 

Unlike the LEED program, Build It Green’s GreenPoint Rated program is a California-centric system.  GreenPoint Rated is specifically designed to be compatible with developers and builders who may want to eventually strive for the more stringent LEED standards, but prefer to start with a smaller bite of the green apple.[4]  Indeed, Build It Green and the USGBC are working closely together, so their systems compliment rather than compete with each other.  Significantly, GreenPoint Rated’s requirements are more generally defined, but provide points for features particularly important to California.  One major criticism of the LEED program is that in creating a national sustainability standard LEED ignores regional needs.  The GreenPoint Rated system answers these criticisms by exclusively tailoring their incentives for homes located in California.

 

The California Green Builder program is also California-centric, and has been utilized by builders and developers in California since 2005.  Like the GreenPoint Rated system, the California Green Builder program offers a more general approach to achieving sustainability goals.  Since the program was designed by the Building Industry Institute, the CA Green Builder program is seen as being more “builder-friendly.” 

 

As energy bills rise, so too does the public’s awareness of “carbon footprints.”  The public now recognizes green certification programs mean real dollar savings.  When developers and builders construct green residences with a negligible increase in cost, attaining one of these green certifications is an easy way to generate buyer interest in a highly competitive market.

[1] Attaining LEED certification adds an average of 0.5% to 2% of initial cost to a building, and adds only .04% when one considers the cost to build and operate a facility for 20 years. (Jeff Ihen, Michaels Engineering, Lorman Construction Update Newsletter, August 2007) ; also see the Bell, Rosenberg & Hughes companion article on financial incentives for sustainable development. 

[2] Through “energy netting” local energy suppliers offer energy credits to users who produce more energy than they use.  With photovoltaic cells in full use during the day while a resident is away from their home, the resident only pays basic service fees for energy, and may pay nothing for actual energy usage.

[3] See www.usgbc.org. Large public housing projects in other states account for the discrepancy between unit and project percentages.

[4] GreenPoint Rated is also compatible with the California Green Builder, and the National Association of Home Builders’ guidelines.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers